With the likelihood of kissing into the address, there can be a life threatening communication ranging from grandiose narcissism and you will new member gender, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. So it communication was exhibited inside Fig dos. The simple slopes for males (simple hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may lady (easy hill = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) were not high. Grandiose narcissists didn’t show an elevated likelihood of kissing having an attached target more a single one (? = .068, t = step 1.127, p = .261), suggesting you to grandiose narcissism was not for the mate poaching to own an initial-label fling.
Grandiose narcissists have a tendency to report spouse poaching -specifically for the latest quick-title . Although not, a concern remains regarding if they see people in dating alot more well worth looking for than just those people who are solitary. Widman and you will McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic inclinations might possibly be triggered all over circumstances an average of (for instance the mind-statement of lifetime frequency of intimate decisions), not become triggered whenever listed in a certain problem. Thus, you are able you to definitely grandiose narcissists disclose a history of engaging within the lover poaching, but do not always find those in relationship becoming best friends. I examined this possibility inside the five education.
Spouse poaching index.
For very long-identity companion poaching, grandiose narcissism was a critical predictor for females (? = .306, t = dos.623, p = .010) and you will a marginally tall predictor for males (? = .218, t = step one.725, p = .088). Nothing of the Larger Four parameters were tall. Grandiose narcissism was not a serious predictor off triumph on poaching into long-label for men (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nevertheless try for ladies (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = free Niche dating sites .021). None of your own additional factors were tall with the exception of ladies’ neuroticism; whenever people was indeed far more neurotic, they stated far more triumph within poaching for some time-identity sexual matchmaking.
Results
Interesting, grandiose narcissism was not for the partner poaching among men. This result is in keeping with results advertised because of the Kardum and colleagues . Ergo, you’ll be able to one grandiose narcissistic women are more frequently accountable regarding mate poaching.
Information and you will process
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.